Hurwitz, Lainie A.

Your profile? Update now
Updated 7/1/2009

firm image

Ruppert & Schaefer, P.C.

2910 E. 96th Street
Suite D

Indianapolis, IN 46240

Phone: 317-580-9295

Fax: 317-580-9298

Contact Us


Summary

Current Employment Position(s)

Attorney

Lawyer Overview

Areas of Practice

  • Family and Domestic Law 100%
100% of Practice Devoted to Litigation

West Practice Categories

Family Law, Adoption, Alimony & Spousal Support, Child Support, Custody & Visitation, Divorce, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Juvenile Law, Paternity, Prenuptial Agreements

Qualifications

Bar Admissions

  • Indiana, 1998
  • U.S. District Court Northern District of Indiana, 1998
  • U.S. District Court Southern District of Indiana, 1998

Certification/Specialties

  • Domestic Mediator, Indiana State Bar Association, 2004

Professional Associations and Memberships

  • Indianapolis Bar Association, Family Law Section, 1998 - Present (Member)
  • Indiana State Bar Association, 1998 - Present (Member)
  • American Bar Association
  • Hamilton County Bar Association

Honors and Awards

  • Recognized as Rising Star by Law and Politics Magazine, 2009 - Present

Classes and Seminars

  • Termination of Parental Rights/CHINS Cases, Indiana Public Defender Council, 2005

Past Employment Positions

  • Law Office of Lainie Hurwitz, P.C., President and Owner, 2002 - 2005
  • Sutherlin & Betz, Associate, 1998 - 2001

Education

  • University of Dayton School of Law, Dayton, Ohio, 1998
    J.D.
  • Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 1995
    B.S.
    Major: Business

Office Information

Address

2910 E. 96th Street
Suite D
Indianapolis, IN 46240

Phones

317-580-9295

Faxes

317-580-9298

Emails

Contact Us

Websites

http://www.randsfamilylaw.com

Feedback

Other Sources of Feedback about Lainie A. Hurwitz

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.