Burkoff, David M.

Your profile? Update now
Updated 01/19/12

firm image

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

399 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Phone: +1 212 295 6304 (Business Phone)

Fax: +1 212 230 8888 (Business Fax)

Contact Us (Business Email)

Websites associated with this firm:http://www.wilmerhale.com

Summary

Year Joined Organization: 2005

Lawyer Overview

David Burkoff is a counsel in the firm’s Litigation/Controversy Department, and a member of the Business Trial Group. He joined the firm in 2005.

Practice

Mr. Burkoff has handled a wide variety of litigation and controversy matters, at all stages, including pre-litigation counseling, discovery, dispositive motion practice, trial and appeal.

Recent Highlights

Mr. Burkoff’s recent highlights include:

  • Confirmation of arbitration award issued in favor of foreign bank after 58-day arbitration hearing on account holders’ claims arising from fraud committed by investment advisor whose clients custodied their assets with the bank
  • Favorable settlement of tort and breach of contract claims brought by two groups of hedge funds against their former hedge fund administrator
  • Dismissal of shareholder derivative suit alleging misleading public disclosures by brand management company
  • Jury verdict in favor of venture capital firm after two-week trial on claims for intentional interference with contract and business relations
  • Summary judgment in favor of broker-dealer and investment advisory affiliates of foreign bank in case concerning fraud committed by investment advisor whose clients custodied their assets with the bank
  • Dismissal of a federal RICO action on grounds of forum non conveniens, subsequently affirmed on appeal
  • Summary judgment on majority of claims brought by software provider against company that agreed to market and sell the provider’s software to its own customers, leading to favorable settlement
  • Favorable settlement of securities fraud claims brought against former CEO of subsidiary of a company that misstated its financial results
  • Dismissal of related state and federal shareholder derivative suits alleging improper stock option backdating by a technology company’s current and former officers and directors
  • Not guilty jury verdict after two-day criminal trial in the Boston Municipal Court

Pro Bono

Mr. Burkoff’s pro bono highlights include:

  • Favorable settlement of dispute between film production company and producer concerning compensation and film credits
  • Favorable settlement of eminent domain dispute on behalf of church sited in path of bridge construction
  • Favorable settlement of dispute between charities named as beneficiaries of a will

Areas of Practice

  • Litigation/Controversy
  • Business Trial Group

Representative Cases

  • Deutsche Telekom , (US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit)
  • Firm Wins Important Victory for Telecommunications Co. Over Ownership of Joint Venture , (US District Court for the Western District of Washington)

West Practice Categories

Bankruptcy Litigation, Class Actions, Complex Litigation, Federal Appellate Practice, Federal Claims Court, Federal Trial Practice, International Trade Litigation, Litigation & Appeals, Multidistrict Litigation, Patent Litigation, State Appellate Practice, State Trial Practice, Tax Litigation, US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, US Supreme Court

Qualifications

Bar Admissions

  • New York
  • Massachusetts

Education

  • University of Michigan Law School, 2003
    JD
    Honors: cum laude
  • Columbia University, 1999
    BA
    Honors: with honors

Office Information

Address

399 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022

Phones

+1 212 295 6304 (Business Phone)

Faxes

+1 212 230 8888 (Business Fax)

Emails

Contact Us (Business Email)

Websites

http://www.wilmerhale.com

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.