|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
|
Mark G. Bonino has over thirty years of experience handling Appellate, Insurance Coverage, and Bad Faith cases. Mr. Bonino is admitted to practice before all of the Courts of the State of California, all of the United States District Courts for California (Northern, Central, Southern and Eastern), and the Districts of Arizona and Hawaii. He is also admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third Circuit, the Ninth Circuit, and the Federal Circuit. Mr. Bonino has handled over 500 appeals to completion and argued a number of important cases in the California Supreme Court and the State and Federal Courts of Appeal such as: Privette v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689 [doctrine of peculiar risk held inapplicable to employees of subcontractors]; Levinson v. Owens (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 1534 [Rider thrown from horse, summary judgment in favor of horse owner affirmed] ; Paiva v. Nichols (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 1007 [Denial of anti-SLAPP motion reversed- judgment entered for defendant]; General Casualty v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 345 [aka: RemedyTemp - depublished - insurer for a special employer does not provide workers' compensation coverage to temporary employees after the general employers' insurer becomes insolvent]; Frank and Fredus v. Allstate (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 461 [employment practices exclusion held to preclude defense in post-termination defamation claim]; Loth v. Truck-A-Way (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 757 [expert testimony on hedonic damages held inadmissible in a personal injury action]; Smith v. State Farm (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 1104 [stipulated judgment held unenforceable against the insurer]; Equitable v. Berry (1989) 212 Cal.App.3d 832 [disability policy held not to apply to manic-depressive illness]; Barker v. Hull (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 221 [ruling on motion held to act as collateral estoppel and bar against later legal malpractice claim]; North Co. Contractors v. Touchstone (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 1085 [settlement held in good faith where the limited available insurance was considered by the trial court]; Santiago v. Employee Benefits (1985) 168 Cal.App.3d 898 [workers compensation insurer held not liable for bad faith failure to settle]. In addition to the appeals, Mr. Bonino has tried bad faith cases to verdict in four different northern California counties and in the U.S. district court and has resolved numerous cases in favor of the defendants by dispositive demurrer, judgment on the pleadings or motion for summary judgment. A native of Southern California, Mr. Bonino attended college at the University of California at Davis, graduating in 1973; he then attended law school at Santa Clara University School of Law, graduating cum laude in 1976. Upon graduation, he served for one and one-half years as law clerk to the presiding judge of the Superior Court of San Mateo County. He is the Past-President of the Association of Defense Counsel for Northern California and Nevada, and is the current California State Representative for the DRI. Before attending law school Mr. Bonino worked on the staff of then-Governor Ronald Reagan. |
|
Partner
|
|
Appellate Insurance Services Bad Faith Cases
|
|
California U.S. District Court District of Arizona U.S. District Court District of Hawaii U.S. District Court Central District of California U.S. District Court Northern District of California U.S. District Court Eastern District of California U.S. District Court Southern District of California U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit U.S. Supreme Court
|
|
Santa Clara University School of Law, Santa Clara, California,
1976 Honors: cum laudeUniversity of California at Davis, Davis, California,
1973 |
|
| Our Government in Action: The Legislature Amends the Summary Judgment Procedures, ADC Defense Comment, v.17, No.3, p.6, 2002
Two Steps Forward - The California Supreme Court Raises the Bar for Legal Malpractice Actions, ADC Defense Comment, v. 18, No. 3, p. 8, 2003
Punitive Damages: On the Road to Reform (IADC Defense Counsel Journal (2003) v.70, No.4, p.432.), 2003
Our Government In Action - Revisited: Proposition 64 and 17200 Reform, ADC Defense Comment v, 20, No. 1 p. 10
California Supreme Court Expands the Privette Doctrine to Narrow Landowner Liability for Worker Injuries, ADC Defense Comment v.21, No. 2, p.10, 2006 |
|
| Just Compensation and No More—Hanif and Howell, Association of Defense Counsel – San Francisco 2010Tricks & Traps in 998 and Summary Judgment Procedure, Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California - 2005 Annual Meeting - San Francisco, California,
2005The Impact Of California Workers' Compensation Reform on Workers' Compensation Claims, Insurance and Torts, Excess and Surplus Lines Claims Association Convention - Santa Fe, New Mexico,
2005New Developments In Coverage - 2004 and 2005, Association of Southern California Defense Counsel - Los Angeles, California,
2005Santa Clara County Bar Association Winning on Appeal Effective Oral Argument, Court of Appeal, San Jose, California,
2004The New World of Claim Handling and Insurance Relations, Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters 2004 Annual Meeting - Los Angeles, California,
2004Punitive Damages One Year After Campbell, Association of California Insurance Companies Annual Meeting - Las Vegas, Nevada,
2004New Developments In Coverage 2003 and 2004, Association of Southern California Defense Counsel - Angeles, California,
2004Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California Transportation Seminar Sacramento, California,
2004Silicon Valley Biz Ink Forum Hot Insurance Issues: Workers Comp Crisis San Jose, California,
2003Santa Clara County Bar Association 2002 Changes In Summary Judgment Law San Jose, California,
2003Pacific Claims Executives Convention The New Summary Judgment and Construction Defect Legislation Monterey, California,
2002First and Third Party Insurance Claims After The World Trade Center Attack Monterey, Excess and Surplus Lines Claims Association Convention - California,
2002Speaker, Annual Ropers, Majeski, Kohn and Bentley Annual California Law Update The Year In Review Boston, New York, Hartford, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Irvine and Sacramento |
|
Insurance Law, Bad Faith, Litigation & Appeals
|
| |
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers.
|
|
|