Legal Issue: (e.g., Divorce) Location: (e.g., Chicago, IL or 60611)     
      
   FindLaw > Lawyer Directory > Lawyer Profile Save   Email   Print  Update   Get Listed   
Craig E. Stewart
Firm: Jones Day
Address: 555 California Street
26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Map & Directions
Phone: 1.415.875.5714 (Business Phone)
Fax: 1.415.875.5700 (Business Fax)
E-mail: Contact Us (Business Email)
Web site: http://www.jonesday.com

Position Areas of Practice Bar Admissions
Education Published Works Representative Cases
Lawyer Profile:

Craig Stewart specializes in appellate litigation and in legal strategy and complex motions in trial court litigation. He has represented clients in dozens of appeals in federal and state courts in a wide variety of subject matter areas, including antitrust, employment, ERISA, environmental law, land use, constitutional claims, privacy, mass torts, contract disputes, and product liability. Craig's cases include landmark decisions from the California Supreme Court on the summary judgment standard in antitrust conspiracy cases, the arbitrability of employment disputes, and the constitutionality of student-athlete drug testing.

In the trial court, his practice focuses on complex business litigation, primarily antitrust and unfair business practice claims. He has litigated motions to dismiss, class certification and summary judgment motions, and other significant motions in major litigation. His recent experience includes defending price-fixing and monopolization cases under state and federal laws, defending unfair business practice claims under California's Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, prosecuting a federal preemption claim, defending class actions alleging violations of wage and hour laws, and representing clients in regulatory proceedings in the California Public Utilities Commission.

Craig's pro bono experience includes representing on appeal a First Amendment media coalition that successfully challenged a restriction on public viewing of executions, representing a fair housing organization that successfully challenged discriminatory rental practices, and representing a inmate who obtained a federal court injunction against a restrictive prison mail policy.

Current Employment Position(s):
Partner

Areas of Practice:
Issues & Appeals
Appellate Advocacy in the U.S. Supreme Court
Appellate Litigation in Other Federal & State Courts
Trial Litigation in Federal & State Courts
Antitrust & Competition Law
Antitrust Litigation
Privacy & Data Security
Bar Admissions:
California
Education:
Brigham Young University

Published Works:
The Supreme Court's Decision in Kelo v. City of New London: A Landmark Development Regarding the Governmental Power of Eminent Domain, 2005

Representative Cases:
Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa Cruz, 115 Cal. App. 4th 952 (2004) (Timber regulation; Preemption)
Marte v. Chevron Corporation Long-Term Disability Plan, No. 92-15798 (9th Cir. 1993) (ERISA)
Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Corp., 25 Cal. 4th 826 (2001)
Anzai v. Chevron Corp., No. 98-00792-SPK (D. Hawaii)
Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychare Services, Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83 (2000)
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal, 122 S. Ct. 2045 (2002)
Cinelli v. Security Pacific Corp., 61 F.3d 1437 (9th Cir. 1995)
Citizens for a Better Environment v. Union Oil Co., 83 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 789 (1997)
City of Fremont v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, 34 Cal. App. 4th 1780 (1995)
Clement v. California Department of Corrections, 364 F. 3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2004)
Clement v. California Department of Corrections, 364 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2004)
Coalition for a One-Stop Terminal v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist., No. A080180 (Cal. App. 1999)
Feiler v. Chrysler Corp., No. 95-15313 (9th Cir. 1996)
Francies v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., No. 97-15451 (9th Cir. 1998)
Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 7 Cal.4th 1 (1994)
In re Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) Antitrust & Patent Litigation and Lossada v. Union Oil Company of Calif., and consolidated / coordinated actions
Junitha Bee, et al. v. Kavlico Corp., et al., No. BC 202587 (Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. County)
Lea v. Pacific Bell,No. 9971366 (S.F. Super. Ct.)
Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., 125 S.Ct. 2074
linkLINE Commc’ns v. SBC Cal., No. 05-56023 (9th Cir.)
linkLine v. SBC California, Inc., No. 03-5265 SVW (C.D. Cal)
McDaniel v. Chevron Corporation, 203 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2000)
Pacific Bell v. California Department of Transportation, No. C-02-2500-JSW (N.D. Cal.)
Pacific-Union Club v. Superior Court, 232 Cal. App. 3d 60 (1991)
Shea v. Tosco Corporation, No. 98-35588 (9th Cir. 2000)
Stein v. Pacific Bell, No. C-00-2915-SI (N.D. Cal. April 19, 2004), appealed, No. 04-16201 (9th Cir. docketed June 14, 2004)
Texaco v. Dagher, 126 S.Ct. 1276 (2006) (2006)
Visa USA, Inc. v. United States, 125 S. Ct. 45 (2004) (denying certiorari)
Von Tonder v. Chevron Corp., No. A104870 (Cal. App.)
West Practice Categories:
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Antitrust Law, Bankruptcy Litigation, Business & Commercial Law, Class Actions, Complex Litigation, Deceptive Trade Practices, Federal Appellate Practice, Federal Claims Court, Federal Trial Practice, International Antitrust, International Trade Litigation, Litigation & Appeals, Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures, Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures, Military & Veterans Appeals, Multidistrict Litigation, Patent Litigation, RICO Act, State Appellate Practice, State Trial Practice, Tax Litigation, Trade Regulation, Unfair Competition, US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, US Supreme Court

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers.

Legal Issue: (e.g., Divorce) Location: (e.g., Chicago, IL or 60611)    
       Search by Name
Advanced Search

FindLaw Lawyer Directory Browse by Location | Browse by Legal Issue | Guided Search | Search by Name | Advanced Search | Help
Copyright © 2007 FindLaw. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED    Privacy Policy  Disclaimer About FindLaw  Advertise on FindLaw