Mangum, David G.

Your profile? Update now
Updated 5/11/2011

firm image

Parsons Behle & Latimer

201 South Main Street
Suite 1800

Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2218

Phone: 801-532-1234

Fax: 801-536-6111

Contact Us


Summary

Lawyer Overview

David G. Mangum is a trial lawyer in the intellectual property and antitrust practice group of the firm's Litigation department. He has led PB&L teams in various bench and jury trials, and represented clients in numerous appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He is recognized in Chambers USA and Best Lawyers in America for Intellectual Property Litigation. Benchmark Litigation lists Mr. Mangum as one of 18 "Utah Litigation Stars" and wrote that "David Mangum is one of the, if not the best Intellectual Property litigators, certainly in the region."

Mr. Mangum has represented clients in intellectual property and antitrust lawsuits in federal courts throughout the United States. He has litigated patents pertaining to chemical, electrical and mechanical products and processes in a variety of industries, including oil and gas production, process technology, computer software and hardware and medical treatment. Representative clients include Baker Hughes Inc., Danaher Corporation and Life Technologies Corporation.

Upon graduation from law school, Mr. Mangum served a judicial clerkship for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where he had the opportunity to work for now Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as well as all of the other members of that court.

Related Activities and Skills:

  • Utah State Bar Association and American Bar Association: Litigation, Intellectual Property and Antitrust Sections
  • Conversational in Spanish

Published Works:

  • Co-Author: Measuring Damages in a Private Plaintiff Robinson - Patman Case: Applying Economics to Relieve the Pain of J. Truett Payne, XLVIII The Antitrust Bulletin 77, Spring, 2003
  • Co-Author: Much Ado About Nothing: Recent Criticism of the Federal Trade Commission Decision to Order Columbia/HTI to Divest Three Hospitals, Utah's Health: An Annual Review, at 5, 1995
  • Author: Arbitration of Representational Issues: A Critique of Carey, BYU L. Rev. 349, 1983
  • Author: Standing Versus Justiciability: Recent Developments in Participatory Suits Brought by Congressional Plaintiffs, BYU L. Rev. 371
  • Co-Author: Mergers in Western Coal Markets: Conforming Antitrust Analysis to the New Reality, 99 W. Va. L. Rev. 1997
  • Co-Author: Importing the Merger Guidelines Into Judicial Determinations of Relevant Antitrust Markets Potential Benefits and Limitations, XLII The Antitrust Bulletin 121, Spring 1997

Areas of Practice

  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Litigation & Appeals
  • Patent Litigation
  • Trade Secrets Litigation
  • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
  • Federal Appellate Practice
  • Federal Trial Practice

Representative Clients

  • Baker Hughes Incorporated
  • Danaher Corporation
  • Life Technologies Corporation

Representative Cases

West Practice Categories

Antitrust, Intellectual Property, Litigation & Appeals, Patents

Qualifications

Bar Admissions

  • Utah, 1984
  • U.S. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 5th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 10th Circuit

Education

  • Brigham Young University, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Provo, Utah, 1983
    J.D.
    Honors: magna cum laude
    Honors: Order of the Coif
  • University of Utah, 1980
    B.A.
    Honors: magna cum laude
    Major: Economics

Office Information

Address

201 South Main Street
Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2218

Phones

801-532-1234

Faxes

801-536-6111

Emails

Contact Us

Websites

http://www.parsonsbehlelaw.com (http://www.parsonsbehle.com)

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.