Norman B. Blumenthal - San Diego, CA
Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik - Employment Lawyers
2255 Calle ClaraSan Diego, CA 92037-3107 www.bamlawca.com
View additional websites ยป
- Accepts Credit Cards
- Offers Free Initial Consultation
Norman B. Blumenthal Overview
Background
Norman was born in Washington, D.C. on January 31, 1948. He received his B.A. from the University of Wisconsin in 1970 and then proceeded to earn his J.D. from the Loyola University of Chicago in 1973. He was admitted to the Bar in Illinois in 1973 and in California in 1976.
In 1973 and until 1975, Norman was a Law Clerk for Illinois Supreme Court Justice Thomas J. Moran, while serving on the Illinois Court of Appeals. He has been an instructor of Oil and Gas Law at the California Western School of Law in 1981 and the University of San Diego School of Law in 1983. Norman served as President and Chairman of the Board of the San Diego Petroleum Club Inc. in 1985 to1986. In addition, he held the position of the Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel for the Brumark Corporation from 1980 to 1987.
Experienced San Diego Employment Lawyer
Norman is a California class action pioneer. For over two decades, he has been representing employees and consumers in California in class action lawsuits for the purpose of handling the next great case to champion justice in a world where business at the extremes takes unfair advantage of employees and consumers. In total, Norman has obtained over $1.3 Billion on behalf of employees and consumers. More importantly, he has ushered in good public policy for the benefit of all Californians everywhere.
As a result of Jordan v. Cal. DMV, on June 8, 2000, the California Governor signed two bills passed by the Legislature, which found and declared that approximately 1,700,000 vehicle owners paid a an unconstitutional smog impact fee imposed by California on out of state vehicles. This amounted to a $500 million in unconstitutional smog impact fees imposed on drivers. After interest, Norman helped settle this case for over $650 million dollars. Norman enabled over 1.7 million people get refunds for a smog impact fee that was unconstitutional.
Overtime Pay Lawyer Fighting For Employee Wages
It is too easy for employees to assume that their paychecks reflect the true amount of hours they worked and money they earned. Employers are always trying to tighten margins and unfortunately one of the first places they look to do this is with the cost of labor. However, since businesses still need the labor, they in fact do not cut back on labor costs; instead, they simply start cheating employees out of the full amount of overtime wages they earn.
Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik represents employees throughout California in lawsuits to collect unpaid overtime wages. The firm has the resources and experience to help employees fight back against illegal pay practices such as:
- Employee’s being misclassified as exempt from overtime
- Employee’s being misclassified as Independent Contractors
- Employees working “off the clock”
- Employees being cheated out of mandatory, off-duty meal and rest breaks
- Employees not being reimbursed for work-related expenses
- Employees not being paid overtime at one and a half times their regular rate of pay for working hours in excess of eight in a workday or forty in a workweek
- Unpaid vacation time and holiday time
Working Off the Clock Without Pay?
In California, employers are required to give all non-exempt employees accurate itemized wage statements. These wage statements must include everything from the amount of time the employee works to the amount of money the employee makes for that particular time he or she is working.
Many employers don’t only fail to issue accurate itemized wage statements with all of this information. In fact, employers frequently fail to even have a timekeeping system that is capable of tracking all of the hours employees work. Some time tracking systems actually go as far as to not allow employees to record and report overtime hours worked. Employees are suppose to receive one and a half times the regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of eight hours in a workday, forty hours in a workweek, or for the first eight hours on a seventh consecutive day. In addition, employees are entitled to receive two times the regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of twelve in a single workday and double the regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of eight hours on a seventh consecutive workday. How can employers pay employees the proper amount of wages if there is not even a timekeeping system that is capable of tracking and recording all of the time these employees work? What’s more, some employers have a timekeeping system that takes time away from employees. For example, timekeeping systems that are subject to manipulation are problematic because managers and supervisors may be instructed by the company to reduce or erase the true amount of hours that employees work. In effect, employees are losing out on overtime wages and other wages that they earned through the performance of labor.
If this is happening to you, contact one of our San Jose employment lawyers today for a free consultation about your work rights.
San Francisco Employment Law Help
The general presumption in California is that all employees are entitled to overtime compensation for working more than eight hours in a single day. They are also entitled to overtime compensation for working more than forty hours in a workweek under both federal and state laws. Businesses seek to avoid paying employees overtime wages by misclassifying them as exempt from overtime. It is the employer’s burden to prove that the employees are in fact exempt from overtime based on certain exemption tests, but employees rarely challenge their exempt classifications and therefore employers get away with these misclassifications.
Here is a partial list of the types of employees that are regularly misclassified as exempt from overtime:
- Employees performing manual labor
- Employees performing clerical labor
- Laboratory Technicians and managers
- Computer Technicians
- IT/IS Professionals
- Managers and Supervisors
- Security Guards
- Armored Car Drivers and Guards
- Waiters and Waitresses
- Cable Technicians
- Scientific Employees
- Pharmaceutical Employees
Call 877-852-3912 to Learn About Your California Employment Law Rights
If you think that your employer may have committed illegal overtime practices against you or your fellow employees, contact an experienced overtime wage attorney at Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik today. We offer all employees free consultations. We also represent employees on a contingency basis, meaning that they never pay our attorneys a single dollar until and unless we recover money for them. We have the resources and experience to represent workers in individual and class action lawsuits throughout California communities such as San Diego, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Orange County, Oakland, Sacramento and Santa Clara.
Practice Areas
- Employment Class Action Litigation
- Civil Litigation
- Consumer and Securities Class Action
Litigation
- 100% of Practice Devoted to Litigation
Current Employment Position(s)
- Managing Partner
Bar Admissions
- Illinois, 1973
- California, 1976
Other Affiliations
- San Diego County Bar Association (Member)
- Illinois State Bar Association (Member)
- American Bar Association (Member)
- State Bar of California (Member)
Education
- Loyola University Chicago School of Law, Chicago, Illinois,
1973
J.D. - University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin,
1970
B.A.
Past Positions
- Illinois Supreme Court Justice Thomas J. Moran, while serving on the Illinois Court of Appeals, Law Clerk, 1973 - 1975
- San Diego Petroleum Club Inc., President, Board
- San Diego Petroleum Club Inc., Chairman, Board, 1985 - 1986
- Brumark Corporation, Chief Operating Officer, 1980 - 1987
- Brumark Corporation, General Counsel, 1980 - 1987
Classes and Seminars
- Instructor, Oil and Gas Law, California Western School of Law, 1981
- Instructor, Oil and Gas Law, University of San Diego School of Law, 1983
Other Sources of Feedback About Norman B. Blumenthal
Included on the 2011 San Diego list
Photos
Address
2255 Calle Clara
San Diego, CA 92037-3107
Phones
858-551-1223
800-568-8020 (California)
858-367-9913 (San Diego)
415-935-3957 (San Francisco Area)
408-681-8477 (Santa Clara)
Faxes
858-551-1232
Emails
Offers Free Initial Consultation
Yes
Accepts Credit Cards
Yes
Office Hours
We offer FREE CONSULTATIONS whenever we are available. We pride ourselves in responding rapidly.
Websites
http://www.bamlawca.com (California Employment Lawyers)
Articles
Exempt or Non-Exempt: Do You Receive Overtime Pay?, Findlaw , 2010
All employees in California are entitled to overtime pay unless they are specifically exempted from under one of the limited exemptions.
Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik Files New Class Action Lawsuits against Raytheon Company, Enterprise Rent-A-Car & Ecolab, Business Wire, November 25, 2010
Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik Files New Class Action Lawsuits against Raytheon Company, Enterprise Rent-A-Car & Ecolab
California Overtime Rights: Do You Know If You Are A Salaried Employee?, EmploymentLawFirms
The way for an employee to figure out whether they are paid a salary is to ask the following question: If I work less than 40 hours in a workweek am I still paid the same fixed amount of money every week?
Representative Cases
- In Re Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Litigation, 2010 WL 4180530 (D.Kan. 2010)
- Kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc.,, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 248 (9th Cir. 2010)
- In Re Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Litigation, 2010 WL 3833034 (D.Kan. 2010)
- Keshishzadeh v. Gallagher, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46805 (S.D. Cal. 2010)
- Steroid Hormone Product Cases, 181 Cal. App. 4th 145 (2010)
- Weltman v. Ortho Mattress, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20521 (S.D. Cal. 2010)
- Weston v. FedEx Office & Print Servs., 707 F. Supp. 2d 1074 (S.D. Cal. 2010)
- Sussex v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LLC, 2010 WL 3171121 (D. Nev. 2010)
- Reynolds v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 332 Fed.Appx. 397 (2009)
- Owen v. Macy's, Inc, 175 Cal. App. 4th 462 (2009)
- Sussex v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LLC,, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29503 (D. Nev. 2009)
- Picus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 256 F.R.D. 651 (D. Nev. 2009)
- Tull v. Stewart Title of Cal., Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14171 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- YOSHI v. FEDEX, 2009 U.S. Dist. Ct. Pleadings 812138 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- La Jolla Friends of the Seals v. Nat'l Oceanic & Atmospheric Admin., 630 F. Supp. 2d 1222 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- In re Pet Food Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL Docket No. 1850 (All Cases), 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94603 (D.N.J. 2008)
- Silvas v. E*Trade Mortg. Corp., 514 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir. 2008)
- REYNOLDS v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., 2008 U.S. 9th Cir. Briefs 55114 (9th Cir. 2008)
- Bova v. Washington Mut., Bank 2008 WL 4791833 (S.D. Cal 2008)
- Delmare v. Sungard Higher Educ., Inc, 2008 WL 2227531 (S.D.Cal. 2008)
- Gruender v. First American Title Co., 2008 WL 2936823 (Cal. Superior 2008)
- La Jolla Friends of the Seals v. Nat'l Oceanic & Atmospheric Admin., Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102380 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Puentes v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., 160 Cal. App. 4th 638 (2008)
- Schiff Food Products Co., v. Perez 2007 WL 4510156 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. 2007)
- In re Tobacco Cases II, 41 Cal. 4th 1257 (2007)
- PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, LLP,, 150 Cal. App. 4th 384 (2007)
- Hall v. County of Los Angeles, 148 Cal. App. 4th 318 (2007)
- Rocker v. KPMG LLP,, 122 Nev. 1185 (2006)
- Silvas v. E*Trade Mortg. Corp., 421 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (S.D. Cal. 2006)
- Meco v. Novaspes, Inc., 2006 WL 93245 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 2006)
- Connel vs. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 2006 WL 4088315 (2006)
- Curry v. CTB McGraw-Hill, LLC,, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5920 (97 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1988)
- 37 Employee Benefits Cas., (BNA) 2390 (N.D. Cal. 2006)
- Coshow v. City of Escondido, 132 Cal. App. 4th 687 (2005)
- In re Tobacco Cases II, 20 Cal.Rptr.3d 693 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. 2004)
- aiheiyo Cement Corp. v. Superior Court, 117 Cal. App. 4th 380 (2004)
- Rezec v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., 116 Cal. App. 4th 135 (2004)
- Briseno v. American Sav. Bank, 2004 WL 5561659 (Cal.Superior 2004)
- Taiheiyo Cement Corp., v. Superior Court, 105 Cal.App. 4th 398 (2003)
- Gibson v. World Savings & Loan Asso., 103 Cal. App. 4th 1291 (2003)
- Delaney v. Warner-Lambert Co., 2003 WL 1548691 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 2003)
- Olszewski v. Scripps Health, 30 Cal. 4th 798 (2003)
- n re Vesta Ins., Group Securities Litigation 2002 WL 34248002 (N.D. Ala. 2002)
- Gibson v. World Savings & Loan Assn., 128 Cal.Rptr.2d 19 (Cal. App. 4th 2002)
- McMeans v. Scripps Health, Inc., 100 Cal. App. 4th 507 (2002)
- Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 100 Cal. App. 4th 431 (2002)
- Badillo v. Am. Tobacco Co., 202 F.R.D. 261 (D. Nev. 2001)
- Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court, 24 Cal. 4th 906 (2001)
- Ramos v. Countrywide Home Loans, 82 Cal.App. 4th 615 (2000)
- Tevssier v. City of San Diego, 81 Cal.App. 4th 685 (2000)
- Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court, 70 Cal. App. 4th 299 (1999)
- Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 75 Cal. App. 4th 445 (1999)
- Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Superior Court, 72 Cal.App.4th 214 (1999)
- Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 75 Cal. App. 4th 445 (1999)
- Badillo v. Am. Tobacco Co., 202 F.R.D. 261 (D. Nev. 2001)
- Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court, 24 Cal. 4th 906 (2001)
- amos v. Countrywide Home Loans, 82 Cal.App. 4th 615 (2000)
- Tevssier v. City of San Diego, 81 Cal.App. 4th 685 (2000)
- Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court, 70 Cal. App. 4th 299 (1999)
- Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 75 Cal. App. 4th 445 (1999)
- Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Superior Court, 72 Cal.App.4th 214 (1999)
- Kensington Capital Mgal. v. Oakley, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist LEXIS 385; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P90, 411 (C.D. Cal. 1999)
- Lister v. Oakley, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 384; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P90, 409 (C.D Cal. 1999)
- Hildago v. Diversified Transp. Sya, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3207 (9th Cir. 1998)
- McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26544 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- Barcia v. Contain-A-Way, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17118 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- Wise v. Cubic Def. Applications, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11225 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- Gabisan v. Pelican Prods., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1391 (S.D. Cal. 2009)
- McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 251 F.R.D. 514 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Barcia v. Contain-A-Way, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27365 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Louie v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78314 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Weltman v. Ortho Mattress, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60344 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- Kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38889 (S.D. Cal. 2008)
- McPhail v. First Command Fin. Planning, Inc., 247 F.R.D. 598 (S.D. Cal. 2007)
- kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57766 (S.D. Cal. 2007)
- Reynov v. ADP Claims Servs. Group, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94332 (N.D. Cal. 2006)
- Daniels v. Philip Morris, 18 F.Supp 2d 1110, 1998 WL 564708 (S.D. Cal. 1998)



