Merrill G. Emerick - San Mateo, CA

San Mateo Civil Litigation Lawyer
Your profile? Update now
Updated 11/16/2010
firm image

Anderlini & Emerick LLP

411 Borel Avenue
Suite 501
San Mateo, CA 94402
www.afespilaw.com
www.sanmateopersonalinjuryblog.com
View additional websites ยป
  • Accepts Credit Cards
  • Offers Free Initial Consultation

Jump To

Merrill G. Emerick Overview

Practice Areas

  • Civil Litigation 70%
  • Civil Appeals 15%
  • Business Transactions 15%

Litigation

  • 70% of Practice Devoted to Litigation

Current Employment Position(s)

  • Managing Partner

Bar Admissions

  • California, 1985
  • Oregon, 1972
  • U.S. District Court District of Oregon, 1972
  • U.S. District Court Northern District of California, 1985
  • U.S. District Court Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, 1985

Other Affiliations

  • San Mateo County Trial Lawyers Association (Past President)
  • San Mateo County Bar Association
  • State Bar of California, Litigation Section (Member)
  • Oregon State Bar
  • Consumer Attorneys of California
  • American Bar Association

Education

  • Indiana University School of Law, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1972
    J.D.
    Honors: cum laude
  • Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 1966
    B.S.
    Major: Education

Past Positions

  • Anderlini, Finkelstein, Emerick & Smoot, Managing Partner, 1985 - 2008

Address

411 Borel Avenue
Suite 501
San Mateo, CA 94402

Phones

(650) 242-4884
(877) 312-9694 (Toll Free)

Faxes

(650) 212-0081

Emails

Contact Us

Offers Free Initial Consultation

Yes

Accepts Credit Cards

Yes

Office Hours

9:00 a.m to 5:00 p.m Monday - Friday

Websites

http://www.afespilaw.com
http://www.sanmateopersonalinjuryblog.com
http://www.aelawllp.com

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.