David Keesling Esq. - Tulsa, OK

Tulsa Lawyer
Your profile? Update now
Updated 3/27/2011
Jump To

David Keesling Esq. Overview

Mr. Keesling's professional career began as a commissioned officer of the United States Marine Corps from 1992 through 2002 wherein he reached the rank of Captain.

Mr. Keesling's law practice began in 2001 when he formed Keesling & Associates, PC in Tulsa, Oklahoma. At that time his practice was focused on civil and criminal litigation, real estate transactions and family/domestic releations.

Mr. Keesling joined Richardson, Richardson, Boudreaux, PLLC in July of 2009. Mr. Keesling is a partner of the firm and currently chairs its Technology Committee. His practice is focused on litigation, trial and appellate work in federal and state courts. The firms practice includes matters involving products liability, personal injury, accidental death and business issues.

Throughout his legal career, Mr. Keesling has tried cases on a regular basis and has obtained excellent results for clients both at trial and through negotiated settlements. Cases have included suits filed in federal and state courts in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri and Texas.

Bar Admissions

  • Oklahoma, 1998
  • U.S. District Court Northern District of Oklahoma
  • U.S. District Court Western District of Oklahoma
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of Oklahoma

Education

  • University of Tulsa College of Law, Tulsa, Oklahoma
    Juris Doctorate
  • Southwest Missouri State University
    Bachelor of Science
    Major: Political Science

Past Positions

  • Keesling & Associates, P.C., Attorney

Videos

Address

6450 South Lewis Avenue
Suite 300
Tulsa, OK 74136-1068

Phones

918-492-7674
877-777-4539

Faxes

918-493-1925

Emails

Contact Us

Websites

http://www.ok-medical-malpractice-rsrwlaw.com

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.