Daniel S. Lenz - Madison, WI

Madison Litigation Lawyer
Your profile? Update now
Updated 4/29/2011
firm image

Lawton & Cates, S.C.

Ten East Doty Street
Suite 400
Madison, WI 53703-5103
www.lawtoncates.com

View additional websites ยป
  • Accepts Credit Cards
  • Offers Free Initial Consultation

Jump To

Daniel S. Lenz Overview

Dan Lenz has experience in civil litigation, labor and employment matters and in handling criminal defense cases. Prior to joining Lawton & Cates, Dan worked as an Intern for the Vilas County District Attorney's Office and gained experience conducting court and jury trials, arguing motions before the court and performing research, pleadings and motions. Other experiences include working in a Chicago law firm providing administrative support to a high-volume civil litigation practice and working as a Judicial Intern for the Honorable John Coffey, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Practice Areas

  • Litigation

Litigation

  • 75% of Practice Devoted to Litigation

Current Employment Position(s)

  • Associate

Bar Admissions

  • Wisconsin, 2010
  • U.S. District Court Western District of Wisconsin, 2011
  • Illinois, 2010

Other Affiliations

  • State Bar of Wisconsin
  • Dane County Bar Association
  • Wisconsin Association for Justice

Education

  • University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, Wisconsin
    J.D.
    Honors: cum laude

Photos

firm image

Address

Ten East Doty Street
Suite 400
Madison, WI 53703-5103

Phones

608-282-6200
800-900-4539 (Toll Free)

Faxes

608-282-6252

Emails

Contact Us

Offers Free Initial Consultation

Yes

Accepts Credit Cards

Yes

Office Hours

8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Mondays through Fridays; after hours appointments available upon request

Websites

http://www.lawtoncates.com
http://www.lawtoncates.com/lcblog/

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.