Katkocin Law Office

The Hansen Warner Building4 Union StreetSuite 202Medford, NJ 08055

Updated: 03/25/2017


Based in Medford, New Jersey, Katkocin Law Office is founded on a commitment to providing hands-on legal representation in a timely and cost-effective manner. The practice was founded by Ronald M. Katkocin, an accomplished civil lawyer who has litigated countless disputes over the past 30 years. Within civil litigation, he handles:

  • Business disputes, breach of contract claims, and other commercial litigation
  • Auto accidents, premises liability claims, and other personal...

Office Info

Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury

Classes and Seminars

  • Adjunct Instructor of Business Law, Cabrini College, 1993 - Present

Pro Bono Activities

  • District IV Ethics Committee, Member, 2013 - Present
  • Recording Secretary for Our Lady of Mount Carmel Pastoral Council, 2006 - 2010
  • Berlin Borough Planning Board, Member, 2011 - 2016
  • Berlin Township children’s co-ed league basketball coach, 2002 - 2007



Office Information


The Hansen Warner Building4 Union StreetSuite 202Medford, NJ 08055


Offers Free Initial Consultation


Videos & Photos




  • Third-Party Removal of an Entire Case 41 Washington & Lee Law Review, 1533, 1984
  • Group Insurance Rebates and the IRC 41 Washington & Lee Law Review, 848, 1984

Representative Cases

  • Collier v. Goepp (In rer Goepp), Chapter 7, Case No. 10-29384 (RTL), Adversary Proceeding Case No. 10-2314 (RTL), United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey, 455 B.R. 388; 2011 Bankr. Lexis 3125, decided and filed August 16, 2011
  • Gilmore v. Berg, Civ. No. 86-4694 (SSB), United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 820 F. Supp. 179; 1993 U.S. Dist. Lexis 5702, decided and filed April 26, 1993
  • In re Opinion No. 24 of Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law, A-91 September Term 1991, Supreme Court of New Jersey, 128 N.J. 114; 607 A.2d 962; 1992 N.J. Lexis 1049, argued February 4, 1992, decided and filed May 14, 1992
  • Molnar v. Hedden, A-16 September Term 1994, Supreme Court of New Jersey, 138 N.J. 96; 649 A.2d 71; 1994 N.J. Lexis 1149, argued September 12, 1994, decided November 17, 1994
  • Molnar v. Hedden, A-2563-91T1, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 260 N.J. Super. 133; 615 A.2d 647; 1992 N.J. Super. Lexis 376, argued October 1, 1992, decided October 27, 1992
  • Stuchin v. Kasirer, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 237 N.J. Super 604; 568 A.2d 907; 1990 N.J. Lexis 5, argued November 29, 1989, decided January 11, 1990, certification denied 121 N.J. 660, 583 A2d. 346 , (1990)

When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.

Call us at 856-283-0800

DISCLAIMER: If you send a lawyer or law firm email through this service, your email will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. You should not send sensitive or confidential information via this email service. The lawyer or law firm to whom you are writing may not choose to accept you as a client. Moreover, as the Internet is not necessarily a secure environment it is possible that your email sent via the Internet might be intercepted and read by third parties.

Firm Address


The Hansen Warner Building4 Union StreetSuite 202Medford, NJ 08055