Are you a legal Professional?
Visit our professional site
Law firm marketing
Updated 03/25/2017Your profile? Update now

Katkocin Law Office - Medford, NJ

Medford Personal Injury Law Firm
The Hansen Warner Building4 Union StreetSuite 202Medford, NJ 08055
Offers Free Initial Consultation
Katkocin Law OfficeLaw Firm Law Firm Overview

Based in Medford, New Jersey, Katkocin Law Office is founded on a commitment to providing hands-on legal representation in a timely and cost-effective manner. The practice was founded by Ronald M. Katkocin, an accomplished civil lawyer who has litigated countless disputes over the past 30 years. Within civil litigation, he handles:

  • Business disputes, breach of contract claims, and other commercial litigation
  • Auto accidents, premises liability claims, and other personal...
Read more

Based in Medford, New Jersey, Katkocin Law Office is founded on a commitment to providing hands-on legal representation in a timely and cost-effective manner. The practice was founded by Ronald M. Katkocin, an accomplished civil lawyer who has litigated countless disputes over the past 30 years. Within civil litigation, he handles:

  • Business disputes, breach of contract claims, and other commercial litigation
  • Auto accidents, premises liability claims, and other personal injury litigation
  • Will contests, breach of fiduciary duty, and other estate litigation

Mr. Katkocin also assists clients with an array of transactional matters, including estate planning and administration and business structuring and operations. Since 1993, he has taught Business Law as an adjunct instructor at Cabrini College. 

Whether a client's case is transactional or litigious in nature, Mr. Katkocin will address each facet of the matter personally. He does not pass work off to paralegals, associate attorneys, or assistants. Instead, he believes that each client deserves to work directly with him.

From its convenient Medford location, Katkocin Law Office is well-positioned to serve individuals, families, and small businesses in Burlington County, Camden County, and the surrounding areas of New Jersey. Call 856-283-0800 for a complimentary phone consultation with Mr. Katkocin about any area of his practice.

Read less
Practice Areas
Personal Injury
Classes and Seminars
Adjunct Instructor of Business Law, Cabrini College, 1993 - Present
Pro Bono Activities
District IV Ethics Committee, Member, 2013 - PresentRecording Secretary for Our Lady of Mount Carmel Pastoral Council, 2006 - 2010Berlin Borough Planning Board, Member, 2011 - 2016Berlin Township children’s co-ed league basketball coach, 2002 - 2007
People
Attorneys
Katkocin, Ronald M. (Sole Practitioner since 1994)
Office Information
Address
The Hansen Warner Building4 Union StreetSuite 202Medford, NJ 08055
Phone
856-283-0800
Offers Free Initial Consultation
Yes
Videos & Photos
Photos
Published
Articles
Third-Party Removal of an Entire Case 41 Washington & Lee Law Review, 1533, 1984
Group Insurance Rebates and the IRC 41 Washington & Lee Law Review, 848, 1984
Representative Cases
Collier v. Goepp (In rer Goepp), Chapter 7, Case No. 10-29384 (RTL), Adversary Proceeding Case No. 10-2314 (RTL), United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey, 455 B.R. 388; 2011 Bankr. Lexis 3125, decided and filed August 16, 2011Gilmore v. Berg, Civ. No. 86-4694 (SSB), United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 820 F. Supp. 179; 1993 U.S. Dist. Lexis 5702, decided and filed April 26, 1993In re Opinion No. 24 of Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law, A-91 September Term 1991, Supreme Court of New Jersey, 128 N.J. 114; 607 A.2d 962; 1992 N.J. Lexis 1049, argued February 4, 1992, decided and filed May 14, 1992Molnar v. Hedden, A-16 September Term 1994, Supreme Court of New Jersey, 138 N.J. 96; 649 A.2d 71; 1994 N.J. Lexis 1149, argued September 12, 1994, decided November 17, 1994Molnar v. Hedden, A-2563-91T1, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 260 N.J. Super. 133; 615 A.2d 647; 1992 N.J. Super. Lexis 376, argued October 1, 1992, decided October 27, 1992Stuchin v. Kasirer, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 237 N.J. Super 604; 568 A.2d 907; 1990 N.J. Lexis 5, argued November 29, 1989, decided January 11, 1990, certification denied 121 N.J. 660, 583 A2d. 346 , (1990)
When viewing a listing, consider the state advertising restrictions to which lawyers and law firms must adhere, as well as our West Legal Directory disclaimers. Some lawyers publish comparative information regarding the services that they provide which may be subject to specific comparative communications restrictions.
Contact Now
* First Name* Last Name* EmailPhoneZip Code* MessagePreferred contact method
Email
Phone
Send me a copy of this email
DISCLAIMER: If you send a lawyer or law firm email through this service, your email will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. You should not send sensitive or confidential information via this email service. The lawyer or law firm to whom you are writing may not choose to accept you as a client. Moreover, as the Internet is not necessarily a secure environment it is possible that your email sent via the Internet might be intercepted and read by third parties.
Firm Address
Phone:
856-283-0800
The Hansen Warner Building4 Union StreetSuite 202Medford, NJ 08055